Popular Posts

Showing posts with label mitochondrial dna. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mitochondrial dna. Show all posts

Thursday, April 7, 2011

X-Factor has us wondering Y


'P' FOR PRISCILLA MITOCHONDRIAL DNA CLASS DISCOVERED

[Yahoo! April 7, 2011]

Scientists say that they have uncovered the first known gay 'caveman' 5000 years after his death.

Archeologists have uncovered the grave of a man they believed to have died between 2900 and 2500 B.C. and was seemingly buried in a way that suggests he was homosexual.

The skeleton of the man, found during an excavation in the Czech Republic, was found on his left side with his head facing west, buried with household jugs and no weapons.

An oval-shaped jug was also found near the feet of the skeleton.

During that period, men were traditionally buried with weapons, hammers and flint knives, and their bodies were placed on their right side with the head facing east.

Women were interred with their bodies on the left, head facing west, and buried with necklaces made from teeth, pets, and copper earrings, as well as domestic jugs and an egg-shaped pot placed near the feet.

Scientists are certain that the body placement was not a mistake, as customs were very strict on burial and funerals at the time.

"From history and ethnology, we know that people from this period took funeral rites very seriously so it is highly unlikely that this positioning was a mistake," said lead researcher Kamila Remisova Vesinova.

"Far more likely is that he was a man with a different sexual orientation, homosexual or transvestite. What we see here does not add up to traditional Corded Ware cultural norms."

There had been previous skeletons discovered where a female warrior had been buried like a man, and Siberian shamans, or witch doctors, had been buried in a similar way to the "gay" caveman, another member of the archaeological team, Katerina Semradova, said.

"This later discovery was neither of those. We believe this is one of the earliest cases of what could be described as a transvestite or third-gender grave in the Czech Republic."

Monday, August 2, 2010

One for the Family Album



OETZI AND I

I have gone a bit quiet of late on matters of Family History but am stirred into action this morning by the appearance of a photo of one of my (distant) relatives.

Oetzi and I are related through our mothers, both of whom belong to the ‘Katrine Clan’ in terms of their mitochondrial DNA.

We seem to share some family characteristics but he looks as though he needs a good feed.

FIVE MILLENIA ON, ICEMAN OF BOLZANO GIVES UP DNA SECRETS

Oetzi's genetic code could shed light on hereditary diseases such as diabetes, hypertension and cancer.

[By Michael Day, UK Independent, Monday, 2 August 2010]

Nearly 20 years after the dead man's head was found peeping from a melting Alpine glacier, investigators have finally seen fit to contact his relatives.

This doesn't indicate sloth on the part of the Italian authorities, but instead, advances in DNA technology that may lead scientists to living descendants of the South Tyrol's 5,300-year-old mummified man.

Oetzi the iceman, who today resides in a sterile, glass box at 7C in 100 per cent humidity, is by far the oldest mummified person ever found – those of ancient Egypt are at least 1,000 years younger. He is the permanent star exhibit in a museum in the town of Bolzano.

In this grotesque but timeless state, researchers have been able to extract DNA from a bone in his pelvis. And this week it was announced they had sequenced his entire genome and that the hunt was now on to find Oetzi's descendants – and evidence of genetic changes that have occurred since Neolithic times.

With Oetzi's complete genetic map for their perusal, Dr Albert Zink, the director of the Iceman Institute in Bolzano, and his colleagues said it might also be possible to shed light on hereditary aspects of diseases such as diabetes, hypertension and cancer.

"There are key gene mutations that we know are associated with diseases such as cancer and diabetes and we want to see if Oetzi had them or whether they arose more recently," he said.

Earlier studies had decoded the iceman's mitochondrial DNA, but these tiny gene sequences, which are passed by mothers to their children, provided only limited information, although they did suggest that if Oetzi still had relatives in the Alps, there weren't that many of them.

Dr Zink, is now working with Carsten Pusch from the Institute of Human Genetics at the University of Tübingen and Andreas Keller from Febit, a bio-tech firm in Heidelberg, to share resources and knowledge, and hopefully speed the arrival of research findings in time for next year's 20th annivesary of Oetzi's discovery.

"From comparisons based on the mitochondrial DNA we weren't able to find any relatives in the region. But with the entire genome, there's a good chance we might," said Dr Zink. "We're at the start of a big and very exciting project. I think Oetzi is going to provide us with a lot of information."

Oetzi has proved a goldmine for scientists since he was discovered in the snow on 19 September 1991, over 3,000m up on the Italian-Austrian border. Anthropologists learnt from the degree and positioning of wear and tear in Oetzi's joints that some Neolithic people, contrary to previous theories, spent most if not all their lives high in the mountains.

Oetzi, who was about 5ft 5in tall, weighed about 59 kg and was probably around 45 years old when he died, had also been around the block a few times. He had three broken ribs, a nasty cut on his hand, the intestinal parasite whipworm and fleas.

Scientist were also able to piece together his attire – a goatskin loincloth, leather leggings, a goatskin coat and a cloak of grass stitched together with animal sinews.

He wore a bearskin cap and leather shoes stuffed with grass to keep his feet warm.

But Oetzi might be considered ahead of his time in the style stakes. While today's young Italians race to cover their legs, necks and elbows in ugly spider web tattoos, Oetzi had beaten them to it with, around 57, rather more tasteful, carbon tattoos consisting of dots and lines.

It was the nature of Oetzi's death, though, that has most captured the imagination. Initially, it was thought that he froze to death in a blizzard.

But CT scans have since revealed that his body contained a flint-headed arrow that entered through his shoulder stopping just short of his left lung, but rupturing the key blood vessel carrying blood from his heart to his left arm. Oetzi was murdered.

"Judging by the degree of damage to a major artery, it's almost certain that he bled to death," said Dr Zink, "and quickly, too."

Traces of blood from four different people on the Otzi's dagger suggest an earlier or ongoing skirmish might have been related to the fatal wound, perhaps with the iceman taking an arrow in the back while fleeing his adversaries -- members, possibly of a rival tribe.

The absence of an arrow shaft has led one researcher, Dr Eduard Egarter Vigl, a pathologist in Bolzano, to suggest the killer had removed it to cover his tracks, since arrows can be identified easily.

More prosaic controversies have arisen, too, following the discovery of his corpse in the Schnalstal glacier. At first, it wasn't clear in which country Oetzi had been discovered. But surveys in October 1991 showed that the body had been found 93 meters inside Italian territory, and so the Italian province grabbed Oetzi.

And the tourist board made a killing. So too did the woman who found him.

Although it wasn't until May this year that the acrimonious dispute over the finder's fee was finally decided.

Authorities announced they would meet the €175,000 (£150,000) demand of the German couple, Helmut and Erika Simon, who found the Iceman. Mrs Simon, by now a widow, argued that the mummy had earned the city of Bolzano tens of million of euros – and that she deserved more than the €5,000 she'd originally been offered for discovering the corpse.

Several others have tried to get the paws on the money. One, a Swiss woman, said she spat on the Iceman to stake her claim. Her DNA was not found on the body, however.

Another, a Slovenian actress, claimed she beat the German couple to the scene by about five minutes and had asked them to take photos of the corpse. But she could produce no one to corroborate her account.

The discovery of Oetzi has also spawned a host of exotic theories regarding the circumstances behind his violent death. One space technology professor has suggested that evidence of an asteroid landing in the area in that period might be linked to the Iceman's demise. He wondered whether Oetzi had been a powerful figure and was used as a ritual sacrifice in order to appease the gods who'd sent the terrifying extra-terrestrial object.

Another theory contested by residents of this formerly Austrian region, who see the Iceman as their forefather, claims he was cast out from his community because a low sperm count rendered him childless.

"I'm not sure whether we'll be able to say whether that's true or not with the DNA sequencing," said Dr Zink. "But there are lots of questions that we might be able to answer."

But staring at poor Oetzi's gnarled, brown corpse, you can't help wondering if the most obvious question is ethical rather than scientific: how recently does someone have to have died before they're entitled to a proper burial - instead of being left in a glass cage like a gooey prop from a horror film, for people to gawp at?

"There has been some discussion on this," says Dr Zink, "and it's a fair point. But this man is 5,300 years old. We do treat him with respect; we look after the body very, very carefully, and he provides us with lot of valuable information. And besides, even if we were to bury him we wouldn't be able to do it according to his customs because we don't know what they were."

So the Iceman will remain the star museum exhibit for the thousands of people who come each year to the Alpine town and stare at his sticky, brown corpse.

But even if they can't bury him, today's distant relatives of the Iceman, might conceivably see the medical benefits -- if, as they say, his captors manage to unlock the secret of his genes.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Cardinal Wolsey and the Aleppo Hamster




Recent mitochondrial DNA studies have established that all domestic golden hamsters are descended from one female – probably the one captured in 1930 in Aleppo, Syria by Israel Aharoni, a zoologist and professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

In 1980, Wesley Brown noted that there were relatively few differences in the mtDNA of human beings, as compared to the levels of difference found in other primates – for example chimpanzees. This suggested that humans share a much more recent common ancestor than other primates do.

Human beings are not as closely inbred as domesticated hamsters – though in terms of the Natural World in general, there isn’t actually that much difference between hamsters and humans. Rather than best being characterized as mongrels we are more properly all classified (all 6-7 billion of us) as purebreds.

As most of us are already aware, all 6-7 billion of the human beings alive today share a male-line ‘Most Recent Common Ancestor’ or Concestor. This man has been termed the ‘Y-chromosomal Adam’. He probably lived between 90,000 and 60,000 years ago.

In non-scientific terms, Adam’s female counterpart is Mitochondrial Eve. She is estimated to have lived around 200,000 years ago. Unlike Adam, she is not a Concestor. This woman is 'simply' the most recent person to whom all people can trace their female-line genealogy. She is the actual matrilineal ancestor of us all. Since mtDNA are inherited maternally and recombination is either rare or absent, it is relatively easy to track the ancestry of the lineages back.

She wasn't the only woman alive when she was living - it is simply that of the women who were alive at that time, her mitochondrial dna best survived. And the dna of the other women didn't disappear - as it is non-mitochondrial it is simply not separately identifiable.

Rohde, Olson & Chang (2004) 'indicate that the overwhelming majority of humans have a recent common ancestor within the last 5000 years (albeit between any two individuals, it may not be the same ancestor), however the genetic relationship between well diverged individuals may not reflect the theoretical relationship, as geographic and cultural barriers may slow gene migration’.

Taking up this point, Richard Dawkins (The Ancestor’s Tale) makes some interesting general observations, using model estimates:

‘Everyone alive in the world at the time of Geoffrey Chaucer (say 1450) will have either the entire world population as descendants or no descendants at all’.

‘The point in time at which everybody was either the ancestor of all modern British people or of none, is only about 40 generations, or about 1000 AD’.

And it only takes the construction of a very simple EXCEL spreadsheet to illustrate the explosion in the numbers of ancestors that we all have, as the generations pass. I have done this below, basing it on my own birth date 1944:

Birth-Generation-Numbers of Ancestors

1944-1-2
1917-2-4 (Father born 1909, mother 1915)
1890-3-8
1863-4-16
1836-5-32 (All 32 great, great grandparents identified)
1809-6-64
1782-7-128 (Earliest paternal ancestor - Shorrocks)
1755-8-256
1728-9-512
1701-10-1,024
1674-11-2,048
1647-12-4,096
1620-13-8,192
1593-14-16,384
1566-15-32,768
1539-16-65,536
1512-17-131,072
1485-18-262,144 (Earliest relative - Lubbock)
1458-19-524,288
1431-20-1,048,576
1404-21-2,097,152
1377-22-4,194,304
1350-23-8,388,608
1323-24-16,777,216
1296-25-33,554,432
1269-26-67,108,864
1242-27-134,217,728
1215-28-268,435,456
1188-29-536,870,912
1161-30-1,073,741,824
1134-31-2,147,483,648
1107-32-4,294,967,296
1080-33-8,589,934,592
1053-34-17,179,869,184 (Norman Conquest)

432-57-144,115,188,075,856,000 (Anglo-Saxon 'Replacement' starts)

0-73-9,444,732,965,739,290,000,000 (The Roman World)

Of course, the reality is that we share our dna through 'diamonds' rather than constantly widening 'triangles'. This is because, beyond a certain point, the progenitors of one of our sets of ancestors also become the progenitors of another set of our ancestors. This is particularly true within geographically restricted ancestral homelands.

So, for example, both my father's father and my mother's maternal grandfather may also share an ancestry with Cardinal Wolsey.

A COMMENT

Thomas Lubbock is one of the earliest people who can be named in my Family Tree:

1.2.2.1.1a Thomas LUBBOCK*, 161
————————————————————————————————————————
Bapt: 18 Mar 1586/1587, Erpingham, Norfolk, England
30 Mar 1672/1673
Burial: 25 Oct 1673, Erpingham, Norfolk, England

Spouse: Mary WOLSEY, 162
Death: 1669
Burial: 14 Nov 1669
Marr: 27 Jun 1614

Now it is known that the Tudor-era senior public servant and mercantilist economist Cardinal Wolsey (he apparently spelt his name as Wulcy) originated in East Anglia. His family and a branch of mine therefore share a common geographic origin.

Thomas Wolsey was born circa 1471, the son of Robert Wolsey of Ipswich (1438–85) and his wife Joan Daundy. His father was widely thought to have been a butcher and a cattle-dealer.

Although he was a Catholic priest, Cardinal Tom had a long-term mistress Joan Larke who was born around 1490 in Yarmouth, Norfolk - another geographic link.

I have no hesitation then in claiming that I am directly related to Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, with the link being confirmed by the marriage of my ancestor Thomas Lubbock to Mary Wolsey in 1614.

On the other hand, we are talking links here within a body of between 500,000 and 1 million of potentially shared ancestors - many of whom, as we have noted, are surely cross-related both to me and to you.

My (& your) genealogical links to the Aleppo Hamster can also be similarly established though they are not quite so direct.

POSTSCRIPT

The fact that we are all genetically related in the not too distant past becomes very obvious in the case of famous people for whom cursory records and sufficiently creative research is available.

In the case of newly settled countries like the USA, the Founder Effect amplifies these linkages. Simply stated, the few early settlers have a proportionately greater influence on a population that is rapidly expanding from high rates of natural increase and high rates of immigration.

It is therefore quite possible that although, overall, the number of German immigrants to the USA exceeded the number of English immigrants, the proportion of the population that has one or more English ancestors is greater than the proportion that has one or more German ancestors.

Take President Barack Obama as an example.

It seems that through his mother Ann Dunham, President Obama can trace his ancestry back to Richard Singletary who was born around 1599 in England. When Richard’s son Jonathan moved from Massachusetts to New Jersey about 1665, he changed his name from Jonathan Singletary to Jonathan Dunham alias Singletary – for reasons unknown.

Ancestry details for Barack Obama compiled by William Addams Reitwiesner are available at:

http://www.wargs.com/political/obama.html

Overall, the genealogical research suggests that through his mother Stanley Ann Dunham, US President Barack is distantly related to U.S. Presidents James Madison, Lyndon Johnson, Gerald Ford, and former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney. He is also apparently also related to British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill, U.S. Civil War General Robert E. Lee, and actor Brad Pitt, as well as Edward I of England (and through him to Queen Elizabeth II) - and Elvis Presley.

The President’s daughters Sasha and Malia Obama are eligible to join the National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution (NSDAR) through 14 ancestors.

But then much of this (excluding the Revolutionary bit) applies to most of those who have English / UK roots of some kind. In fact it has been claimed that anyone who can prove an English ancestor living pre-1750, is inevitably related to the Royal Family.